Open the tool

How does the caridean shrimp see?

The caridean shrimp (Heterocarpus ensifer) is a crustacean in the order Decapoda. Its eyes belong to the vision type Crustacean (mantis shrimp, crab).

Measured in this species: colour, sharpness and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the caridean shrimpThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the caridean shrimp (Heterocarpus ensifer), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
1 receptor class: 497 nm (MWS (green))
measured in this species
Measured (not re-verified)[1]
SharpnessAcuity
0.31 cycles per degree
median of 1 compilation rows (method priority rule)
Measured[2]
Angle between facets
1.6°
median of 1 relatives in class Malacostraca: Phronima sedentaria
Group default[3]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)No value in the catalogue.
Night visionActivity pattern
nocturnal
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V27 within phylum Arthropoda (1 species: Ligia exotica)
Group default[4]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
Group default[4]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
16 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [16.0])
Measured[5]

Other senses

Related animals

More crustaceans: all crustaceans with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Frank TM, Johnsen S, Cronin TW. 2012. J Exp Biol 215:3344-3353. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.072033
  2. AndrewPMeade/FabricTools, sciphy/data_utils/datasets/Arthropod.CompoundEyes.csv (acuity, body length, light, media for 281 arthropods; columns match Feller et al. 2021 Arthropod Struct Dev 60:101002). github.com/AndrewPMeade/FabricTools
  3. Bagheri Z, Jessop A, Partridge J et al. 2022. A new computational model illuminates the extraordinary eyes of Phronima. PLOS Computational Biology. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010545
  4. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  5. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  6. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  7. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?