Open the tool

How does the peacock mantis shrimp see?

The peacock mantis shrimp (Odontodactylus scyllarus) is a crustacean in the order Stomatopoda. Its eyes belong to the vision type Crustacean (mantis shrimp, crab): mantis shrimp: 12 colour classes, UV, linear + circular polarisation; fiddler crab: few classes, low acuity.

Measured in this species: colour and sharpness. Measured colour or sharpness: a measured receptor set or acuity in this species; other dials come from relatives or group defaults. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

Sample scene drawn in code: a face with red lips, a green shirt, red and green apples, flowers and a colour strip, as a person sees it.
The sample scene as a person sees it.
The same sample scene rendered by the See Like Animals engine for the peacock mantis shrimp's eyes, using the values in the table below.
The same scene rendered for the peacock mantis shrimp (60° field of view, daylight).
See your photo as the peacock mantis shrimpThis species is in the free set of the tool. Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the peacock mantis shrimp (Odontodactylus scyllarus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
10 receptor classes: 400 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 429 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 430 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 451 nm (SWS (blue)), 487 nm (MWS (green)), 503 nm (MWS (green)), 506 nm (MWS (green)), 509 nm (MWS (green)), 528 nm (MWS (green)), 546 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured[1]
SharpnessAcuity
1.1 cycles per degree
median of 1 compilation rows (method priority rule)
Measured[2]
Angle between facets
1.6°
median of 1 relatives in class Malacostraca: Phronima sedentaria
Group default[3]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)No value in the catalogue.
Night visionRods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
Group default
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
24.5 Hz
median of 37 relatives in class Malacostraca: Pseudorchomene plebs, Booralana tricarinata, Eugonatonotus crassus, Eumunida picta, Gastroptychus spinifer, Funchalia villosa
Group default[4][5][6]

Other senses

Comparisons

Related animals

More crustaceans: all crustaceans with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Porter ML. Crustacean photoreceptor lambda max compilation, Table 1-1 (dissertation, "Porter_2005" in VPOD); extracted from PDF by VPOD with tabula. github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db
  2. Feller KD, Sharkey CR, McDuffee-Altekruse A, Bracken-Grissom HD, Lord NP, Porter ML, Schweikert LE 2021. Surf and turf vision: patterns and predictors of visual acuity in compound eye evolution. Arthropod Structure & Development 60:101002. doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2020.101002
  3. Bagheri Z, Jessop A, Partridge J et al. 2022. A new computational model illuminates the extraordinary eyes of Phronima. PLOS Computational Biology. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010545
  4. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  5. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
  6. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  7. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?