Open the tool

How does the Japanese rice fish see?

The Japanese rice fish (Oryzias latipes) is a fish in the order Beloniformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shallow-water fish tetrachromat.

Measured in this species: colour, sharpness and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the Japanese rice fishThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the Japanese rice fish (Oryzias latipes), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
7 receptor classes: 356 nm (UVS), 405 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 439 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 452 nm (SWS (blue)), 493 nm (MWS (green)), 516 nm (MWS (green)), 562 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured[1][2][3]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured
SharpnessAcuity
0.563 cycles per degree
median of 1 behavioural rows (method priority rule); acuity_cpd: larval/juvenile rows (adult rows used) set aside (labelled alternative: 1.0)
Measured[4]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
32.85°
group default: median of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (2 species: Danio rerio, Notemigonus crysoleucas)
Group default[5]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (2 species: Toxotes jaculatrix, Anableps anableps)
Group default[6][7]
Fovea type
ventrotemporal area (high rgc density)
Group default[6][7]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (224 species: Amphiprion ocellaris, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, Acanthurus bahianus, Acanthurus chirurgus, Acanthurus coeruleus…
Group default[8][9]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
Group default[8][9]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
37.2 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [37.2]); cff_hz: only larval/juvenile rows exist (larval value used as a labelled fallback)
Measured[10]

Related animals

More fish: all fish with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Frazer SA, Baghalian M, et al. 2024. Discovering genotype-phenotype relationships with machine learning and the Visual Physiology Opsin Database (VPOD). GigaScience 13:giae073; VPOD v1.3 data release. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19051998
  2. Into the blue: Gene duplication and loss underlie color vision adaptations in a deep-sea chimaera, the elephant sharkCallorhinchus milii (2009)
  3. Laver C, Taylor J (2011) RT-qPCR reveals opsin gene upregulation associated with age and sex in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) - a species with color-based sexual selection and 11 visual-opsin genes. BMC Evolutionary Biology
  4. Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S (2017) Visual acuity in ray-finned fishes correlates with eye size and habitat. J Exp Biol 220:1586-1596. Table S1.. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.151183
  5. Pita D, Moore BA, Tyrrell LP, Fernandez-Juricic E. 2015. Vision in two cyprinid fish: implications for collective behavior. PeerJ 3:e1113.. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1113
  6. species_v1:Schwab et al. 2001
  7. species_v1:Temple et al. 2010
  8. Froese R. & Pauly D. (eds). FishBase, snapshot v25.04 (morphmet, morphdat, species, families tables), distributed as parquet by C. Boettiger for rfishbase.. fishbase.org
  9. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  10. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  11. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  12. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?