Open the tool

How does the orangespine unicornfish see?

The orangespine unicornfish (Naso lituratus) is a fish in the order Perciformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shallow-water fish tetrachromat.

Measured in this species: colour. Measured colour or sharpness: a measured receptor set or acuity in this species; other dials come from relatives or group defaults. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the orangespine unicornfishThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the orangespine unicornfish (Naso lituratus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 421 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 496 nm (MWS (green)), 521 nm (MWS (green))
measured in this species
Measured[1][2][3]
SharpnessAcuity
7.1 cycles per degree
median of 1 relatives in family Acanthuridae: Prionurus scalprum
Estimated[4]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
32.85°
group default: median of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (2 species: Danio rerio, Notemigonus crysoleucas)
Group default[5]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
mode of species-v1 relatives in order Perciformes: Toxotes jaculatrix
Group default[6]
Fovea type
ventrotemporal area (high rgc density)
Group default[6]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 15 relatives in family Acanthuridae: Acanthurus chirurgus, Acanthurus coeruleus, Acanthurus lineatus, Acanthurus triostegus, Ctenochaetus striatus, Zebrasoma veliferum
Estimated[7]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
Estimated[7]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
51 Hz
median of 26 relatives in order Perciformes: Dicentrarchus labrax, Thunnus albacares, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, Thunnus obesus, Centropristis striata, Chaetodipterus faber
Group default[8][9][10][11][12]

Related animals

More fish: all fish with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Losey GS et al. 2003. Visual biology of Hawaiian coral reef fishes. I. Ocular transmission and visual pigments. Copeia 2003:433-454. doi.org/10.1643/01-053
  2. Schweikert LE, Fitak RR, Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S. 2018. Spectral sensitivity in ray-finned fishes: diversity, ecology and shared descent. J Exp Biol 221:jeb189761. Table S1. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.189761
  3. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda max compendium, file scp_cleaned.csv, VPOD GitHub (Frazer et al. 2025 bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.08.22.671864). github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db/tree/main/scripts_n_notebooks/vpod_ML_workflows/mine_n_match/data_sources/lmax/vpod
  4. Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S (2017) Visual acuity in ray-finned fishes correlates with eye size and habitat. J Exp Biol 220:1586-1596. Table S1.. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.151183
  5. Pita D, Moore BA, Tyrrell LP, Fernandez-Juricic E. 2015. Vision in two cyprinid fish: implications for collective behavior. PeerJ 3:e1113.. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1113
  6. species_v1:Temple et al. 2010
  7. Froese R. & Pauly D. (eds). FishBase, snapshot v25.04 (morphmet, morphdat, species, families tables), distributed as parquet by C. Boettiger for rfishbase.. fishbase.org
  8. Horodysky A, Brill R, Crawford K et al. (2013) Comparative visual ecophysiology of mid-Atlantic temperate reef fishes. Biology Open
  9. Fogg LG, Chung W-S, Marshall NJ, Cortesi F, de Busserolles F. 2023. Multiple rod layers increase the speed and sensitivity of vision in nocturnal reef fishes. Proc R Soc B 290 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.1749). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.280gb5mtf, mirrored on Zenodo 7636493. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.280gb5mtf
  10. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  11. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
  12. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  13. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?