Open the tool

How does the pinfish see?

The pinfish (Lagodon rhomboides) is a fish in the order Perciformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shallow-water fish tetrachromat.

Measured in this species: motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the pinfishThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the pinfish (Lagodon rhomboides), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 476 nm (SWS (blue)), 545 nm (LWS (long)), 575 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Acanthopagrus butcheri (same family Sparidae)
Estimated[1][2]
SharpnessAcuity
9.091 cycles per degree
median of 5 relatives in family Sparidae: Acanthopagrus berda, Acanthopagrus schlegelii, Dentex tumifrons, Pagrus auratus, Pagrus major
Estimated[3][4]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
32.85°
group default: median of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (2 species: Danio rerio, Notemigonus crysoleucas)
Group default[5]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
mode of species-v1 relatives in order Perciformes: Toxotes jaculatrix
Group default[6]
Fovea type
ventrotemporal area (high rgc density)
Group default[6]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type V18 within phylum Chordata (224 species: Amphiprion ocellaris, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, Acanthurus bahianus, Acanthurus chirurgus, Acanthurus coeruleus…
Group default[7][8]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
Group default[7][8]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
43.7 Hz
median of 1 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [43.7])
Measured[9]

Related animals

More fish: all fish with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Schweikert LE, Fitak RR, Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S. 2018. Spectral sensitivity in ray-finned fishes: diversity, ecology and shared descent. J Exp Biol 221:jeb189761. Table S1. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.189761
  2. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda max compendium, file scp_cleaned.csv, VPOD GitHub (Frazer et al. 2025 bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.08.22.671864). github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db/tree/main/scripts_n_notebooks/vpod_ML_workflows/mine_n_match/data_sources/lmax/vpod
  3. Caves EM, Sutton TT, Johnsen S (2017) Visual acuity in ray-finned fishes correlates with eye size and habitat. J Exp Biol 220:1586-1596. Table S1.. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.151183
  4. Caves EM, Sutton TT, Warrant EJ, Johnsen S 2023. Measures and models of visual acuity in epipelagic and mesopelagic teleosts and elasmobranchs. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. zenodo.org/records/8251016
  5. Pita D, Moore BA, Tyrrell LP, Fernandez-Juricic E. 2015. Vision in two cyprinid fish: implications for collective behavior. PeerJ 3:e1113.. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1113
  6. species_v1:Temple et al. 2010
  7. Froese R. & Pauly D. (eds). FishBase, snapshot v25.04 (morphmet, morphdat, species, families tables), distributed as parquet by C. Boettiger for rfishbase.. fishbase.org
  8. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  9. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  10. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  11. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?