Open the tool

How does the bull ant (Myrmecia gulosa) see?

The bull ant (Myrmecia gulosa) is a insect in the order Hymenoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Bee, ant and locust UV trichromat: 3 receptors (UV/blue/green), no red, very low acuity compound eye, fast CFF, polarisation.

Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

Sample scene drawn in code: a face with red lips, a green shirt, red and green apples, flowers and a colour strip, as a person sees it.
The sample scene as a person sees it.
The same sample scene rendered by the See Like Animals engine for the bull ant (Myrmecia gulosa)'s eyes, using the values in the table below.
The same scene rendered for the bull ant (Myrmecia gulosa) (60° field of view, daylight).
See your photo as the bull ant (Myrmecia gulosa)This species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the bull ant (Myrmecia gulosa) (Myrmecia gulosa), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
2 receptor classes: 412 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 540 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured[1][2]
SharpnessAcuity
0.29 cycles per degree
median of 1 optical rows (method priority rule)
Measured[3]
Angle between facets
1.7°
minimum (acute-zone) interommatidial angle over sources; within caves2018: minimum (round-1 rule: mean of horizontal and vertical when both exist)
Measured[3]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
median of 90 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina
Group default[4]
Fovea type
none
Group default[4]
Night visionActivity pattern
cathemeral
mode of 1 rows (of 1 rows): cathemeral
Measured[1]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[1]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
151.6 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [151.6])
Measured[5]

Other senses

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  2. van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K, Belusic G, Kelber A. 2021. Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435-461. Supplementary table. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
  3. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  4. Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
  5. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  6. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  7. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?