How does the housefly see?
The housefly (Musca domestica) is a insect in the order Diptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Fast fly (slow-motion world): compound eye, very high CFF, panoramic field, low acuity.
Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.
See your photo as the houseflyThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.
What stands out
- It has 5 colour receptor classes, including ultraviolet; people have 3.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 0.2 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- It stops seeing flicker at 83.3 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks about 1.4 times slower to it.[7][8]
- Activity pattern: diurnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 5 receptor classes: 335 nm (UVS), 355 nm (UVS), 460 nm (SWS (blue)), 490 nm (MWS (green)), 530 nm (MWS (green)) measured in this species | Measured (not re-verified) | [1][2][3] |
| Ultraviolet yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet | Measured (not re-verified) | ||
| Sharpness | Acuity 0.2 cycles per degree median of 1 optical rows (method priority rule); facet_diameter_um: only male rows exist (male value used, labelled); interommatidial_angle_deg: male / drone rows set aside (labelled alternative: 1.75, 3.5) | Measured | [4] |
| Angle between facets 2.5° minimum (acute-zone) interommatidial angle over sources; within caves2018: minimum (round-1 rule: mean of horizontal and vertical when both exist); interommatidial_angle_deg: male / drone rows set aside (labelled… | Measured | [4] | |
| Eye type compound eye | |||
| Field of view | No value in the catalogue. | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 0 median of 90 relatives in order Diptera: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina | Group default | [5] |
| Fovea type none | Group default | [5] | |
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal mode of 1 rows (of 1 rows): diurnal | Measured | [2] |
| Rods vs cones no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors) nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [2] | |
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 83.3 Hz median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [83.3]) | Measured | [6] |
Related animals
- Fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) same vision type
- Blowfly (Calliphora vicina) same vision type
- Tsetse fly (Glossina pallidipes) same vision type
- Yellow fever mosquito same vision type
- Blowfly (Calliphora collini) same vision type
- Common green bottle fly same vision type
More insects: all insects with measured vision data.
Sources
- Kelber A, Vorobyev M, Osorio D. 2003. Animal colour vision - behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol Rev 78:81-118. doi.org/10.1017/S1464793102005985
- Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
- van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K, Belusic G, Kelber A. 2021. Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435-461. Supplementary table. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
- Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
- Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
- Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
- Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
- Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?