Open the tool

How does the chimpanzee see?

The chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) is a mammal in the order Primates. Its eyes belong to the vision type Human-like trichromat (baseline).

Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the chimpanzeeThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 430 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 530 nm (MWS (green)), 560 nm (LWS (long))
species-v1.csv value measured in this species (not in tidy tables)
Measured (not re-verified)[1]
SharpnessAcuity
64.28 cycles per degree
median of 1 behavioural rows (method priority rule)
Measured[2]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
122.5°
median of 1 relatives in family Hominidae: Homo sapiens
Estimated[3][4]
Total field of view
200°
median species-v1 total field of family Hominidae: Homo sapiens
Estimated[5]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
1
fovea_present / area_centralis_type (retinal topography; count 1 = fovea present, 0 = none)
Measured[6]
Fovea type
fovea
Measured[6]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 7 rows (of 7 rows): diurnal; photopic
Measured (not re-verified)[7][8][9][10][11][12]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[7][8][9][10][11][12]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
60 Hz
median of 1 relatives in family Hominidae: Homo sapiens
Estimated[13][14]

Related animals

More mammals: all mammals with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. species_v1:Jacobs, Deegan & Moran 1996
  2. Veilleux CC, Kirk EC 2014. Visual acuity in mammals. Brain Behav Evol 83:43, Supplementary Table 1 (cleaned CSV in Evo-M1-Trait-Data). doi.org/10.1159/000357830
  3. Heesy CP 2004. On the relationship between orbit orientation and binocular visual field overlap in mammals. Anat Rec 281A:1104, Table 1. doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.20116
  4. Heffner RS, Heffner HE 1992. Visual factors in sound localization in mammals. J Comp Neurol 317:219, Table 1 (via Evo-M1 sensory merge). doi.org/10.1002/cne.903170302
  5. species_v1:Campbell & Green 1965
  6. Kopania EEK, Clark NL. 2025. Mammalian retinal specializations for high acuity vision evolve in response to both foraging strategies and morphological constraints. Evolution Letters 9: qrae072. Supplementary Tables S1-S2.. doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qrae072
  7. Borges R, Johnson WE, O'Brien SJ, Gomes C, Heesy CP, Antunes A (2018) Adaptive genomic evolution of opsins reveals that early mammals flourished in nocturnal environments. BMC Genomics 19:121
  8. Wilman et al. 2014 EltonTraits 1.0, MamFuncDat.txt. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3559887.v1
  9. Maor R, Dayan T, Ferguson-Gow H, Jones KE. 2017. Temporal niche expansion in mammals from a nocturnal ancestor after dinosaur extinction. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1:1889-1895. Supplementary Table 1. doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0366-5
  10. Jones KE et al. 2009. PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90:2648. Ecological Archives E090-184. doi.org/10.1890/08-1494.1
  11. Schmitz L, Motani R. 2011. Science 332:705-708, SOM. doi.org/10.1126/science.1200043
  12. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  13. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  14. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?