Open the tool

How does the anole lizards (Anolis lineatopus) see?

The anole lizards (Anolis lineatopus) is a reptile in the order not recorded. Its eyes belong to the vision type Diurnal reptile tetrachromat.

Measured in this species: colour, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the anole lizards (Anolis lineatopus)This species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the anole lizards (Anolis lineatopus) (Anolis lineatopus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
4 receptor classes: 366 nm (UVS), 449 nm (SWS (blue)), 498 nm (MWS (green)), 560 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured[1]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured
SharpnessNo value in the catalogue.
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
2
mode of species-v1 relatives in family Dactyloidae: Anolis carolinensis
Estimated[2]
Fovea type
central fovea, temporal
Estimated[2]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 3 rows (of 3 rows): Diurnal; diurnal
Measured (not re-verified)[1][3][4]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[1][3][4]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
26.1 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [26.1])
Measured[5]

Related animals

More reptiles: all reptiles with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  2. species_v1:Fleishman et al. 1988 / Makaretz & Levine 1980
  3. Meiri 2024. SquamBase: a database of squamate (Reptilia: Squamata) traits. Global Ecol Biogeogr (data Zenodo 10602503).. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10602503
  4. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  5. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  6. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  7. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?