Open the tool

How does the inagua least gecko see?

The inagua least gecko (Sphaerodactylus inaguae) is a reptile in the order not recorded. Its eyes belong to the vision type Colour or navigation at night.

Measured in this species: night vision and motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the inagua least geckoThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the inagua least gecko (Sphaerodactylus inaguae), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 365 nm (UVS), 452 nm (SWS (blue)), 533 nm (MWS (green))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Teratoscincus scincus (same family Sphaerodactylidae)
Estimated[1][2]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Estimated
SharpnessNo value in the catalogue.
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
2
mode of species-v1 relatives in class Squamata: Anolis carolinensis, Furcifer pardalis
Group default[3][4]
Fovea type
central fovea, temporal
Group default[3][4]
Night visionActivity pattern
nocturnal
mode of 2 rows (of 2 rows): Nocturnal; nocturnal
Measured (not re-verified)[5][6]
Rods vs cones
rod-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[5][6]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
25.1 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [25.1])
Measured[7]

Related animals

More reptiles: all reptiles with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  2. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda max compendium, file scp_cleaned.csv, VPOD GitHub (Frazer et al. 2025 bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.08.22.671864). github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db/tree/main/scripts_n_notebooks/vpod_ML_workflows/mine_n_match/data_sources/lmax/vpod
  3. species_v1:Fleishman et al. 1988 / Makaretz & Levine 1980
  4. species_v1:Ott & Schaeffel 1995
  5. Meiri 2024. SquamBase: a database of squamate (Reptilia: Squamata) traits. Global Ecol Biogeogr (data Zenodo 10602503).. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10602503
  6. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  7. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  8. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  9. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?