Open the tool

How does the western diamondback rattlesnake see?

The western diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox) is a reptile in the order not recorded. Its eyes belong to the vision type Snake with heat pits: eyes (2-3 cones) plus a separate infrared image from pit organs (simulated from temperature proxies only).

Measured in this species: night vision. Estimated: no vision measurement in this species. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

Sample scene drawn in code: a face with red lips, a green shirt, red and green apples, flowers and a colour strip, as a person sees it.
The sample scene as a person sees it.
The same sample scene rendered by the See Like Animals engine for the western diamondback rattlesnake's eyes, using the values in the table below.
The same scene rendered for the western diamondback rattlesnake (60° field of view, daylight).
See your photo as the western diamondback rattlesnakeThis species is in the free set of the tool. Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the western diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 368 nm (UVS), 485.5 nm (MWS (green)), 538.5 nm (MWS (green))
median receptor set of 6 measured colubroid snakes (superfamily Colubroidea, which contains Viperidae; no viperid measured in the tables): Arizona elegans, Hypsiglena torquata, Lampropeltis getula, Masticophis…
Group default[1]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Group default
SharpnessNo value in the catalogue.
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
2
mode of species-v1 relatives in class Squamata: Anolis carolinensis, Furcifer pardalis
Group default[2][3]
Fovea type
central fovea, temporal
Group default[2][3]
Night visionActivity pattern
cathemeral
mode of 3 rows (of 3 rows): Diurnal; cathemeral
Measured (not re-verified)[4][5][6]
Pupil shape
slit (or vertical elliptical)
Estimated[7][4]
Rods vs cones
mixed
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[4][5][6]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
34.6 Hz
median of 15 relatives in class Squamata: Phrynosoma cornutum, Sphaerodactylus inaguae, Anolis cristatellus, Anolis gundlachi, Anolis pulchellus, Iguana iguana
Group default[8][9][10][11]

Other senses

Related animals

More reptiles: all reptiles with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  2. species_v1:Fleishman et al. 1988 / Makaretz & Levine 1980
  3. species_v1:Ott & Schaeffel 1995
  4. Oskyrko O, Mi C, Meiri S, Du W. 2024. ReptTraits: a comprehensive dataset of ecological traits in reptiles. Scientific Data 11 (doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03079-5). Dataset v1-2 (includes Meiri 2018 lizard traits). doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24572683.v4
  5. Meiri 2024. SquamBase: a database of squamate (Reptilia: Squamata) traits. Global Ecol Biogeogr (data Zenodo 10602503).. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10602503
  6. Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
  7. Banks MS, Sprague WW, Schmoll J, Parnell JAQ, Love GD. 2015. Science Advances 1:e1500391. doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500391
  8. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  9. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  10. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
  11. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?