How does the giant shovelnose ray see?
The giant shovelnose ray (Glaucostegus typus) is a shark or ray in the order Rhinopristiformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shark, ray and warm-eyed ocean predator.
Measured in this species: colour. Measured colour or sharpness: a measured receptor set or acuity in this species; other dials come from relatives or group defaults. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.
What stands out
- It has three colour receptor classes, like most people.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 3.98 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- It stops seeing flicker at 45 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks choppier to it.[6][7]
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 3 receptor classes: 477 nm (SWS (blue)), 502 nm (MWS (green)), 561 nm (LWS (long)) measured in this species | Measured (not re-verified) | [1] |
| Sharpness | Acuity 3.98 cycles per degree median of 27 relatives in class Elasmobranchii: Alopias superciliosus, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, Carcharhinus leucas, Carcharhinus melanopterus, Carcharhinus plumbeus, Centroscymnus coelolepis | Group default | [2][3][4] |
| Field of view | No value in the catalogue. | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | No value in the catalogue. | ||
| Night vision | No value in the catalogue. | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 45 Hz median of 1 relatives in order Rhinopristiformes: Platyrhinoidis triseriata | Group default | [5] |
Related animals
- Bottlenose wedgefish same vision type
- Eastern fiddler ray same vision type
- Eastern shovelnose ray same vision type
- Thornback ray same vision type
- Western shovelnose ray same vision type
- Brownbanded bamboo shark same vision type
More sharks and rays: all sharks and rays with measured vision data.
Sources
- species_v1:Hart et al. 2004
- Caves EM, Sutton TT, Warrant EJ, Johnsen S 2023. Measures and models of visual acuity in epipelagic and mesopelagic teleosts and elasmobranchs. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. zenodo.org/records/8251016
- Caves EM, Fernandez-Juricic E, Kelley LA (2024) Ecological and morphological correlates of visual acuity in birds. J Exp Biol 227(2): jeb246063. Supplementary Table S1.. doi.org/10.1242/jeb.246063
- Claes JM et al. 2014. Photon hunting in the twilight zone: visual features of mesopelagic bioluminescent sharks. PLoS ONE 9:e104213, Dataset S1. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104213
- Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
- Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
- Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?