Open the tool

How does the horn shark see?

The horn shark (Heterodontus francisci) is a shark or ray in the order Heterodontiformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shark, ray and warm-eyed ocean predator.

Measured in this species: motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the horn sharkThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the horn shark (Heterodontus francisci), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 475 nm (SWS (blue)), 533 nm (MWS (green)), 562 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Urobatis jamaicensis (same class Elasmobranchii)
Group default[1][2]
SharpnessAcuity
3.125 cycles per degree
median of 1 relatives in genus Heterodontus: Heterodontus portusjacksoni
Estimated[3]
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)No value in the catalogue.
Night visionNo value in the catalogue.
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
20 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (single-neuron rows; all rows: [20.0])
Measured[4]

Related animals

More sharks and rays: all sharks and rays with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Hart NS, Lamb TD, Patel HR et al. 2020. Visual opsin diversity in sharks and rays. Mol Biol Evol 37:811-827. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz269
  2. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda max compendium, file scp_cleaned.csv, VPOD GitHub (Frazer et al. 2025 bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.08.22.671864). github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db/tree/main/scripts_n_notebooks/vpod_ML_workflows/mine_n_match/data_sources/lmax/vpod
  3. Caves EM, Sutton TT, Warrant EJ, Johnsen S 2023. Measures and models of visual acuity in epipelagic and mesopelagic teleosts and elasmobranchs. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. zenodo.org/records/8251016
  4. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  5. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  6. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?