Open the tool

How does the piked dogfish see?

The piked dogfish (Squalus acanthias) is a shark or ray in the order Squaliformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shark, ray and warm-eyed ocean predator.

Measured in this species: motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the piked dogfishThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the piked dogfish (Squalus acanthias), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 475 nm (SWS (blue)), 533 nm (MWS (green)), 562 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Urobatis jamaicensis (same class Elasmobranchii)
Group default[1][2]
SharpnessAcuity
7.2 cycles per degree
median of 1 relatives in genus Squalus: Squalus mitsukurii
Estimated[3]
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)No value in the catalogue.
Night visionNo value in the catalogue.
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
20 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [20.0])
Measured[4]

Related animals

More sharks and rays: all sharks and rays with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Hart NS, Lamb TD, Patel HR et al. 2020. Visual opsin diversity in sharks and rays. Mol Biol Evol 37:811-827. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz269
  2. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda max compendium, file scp_cleaned.csv, VPOD GitHub (Frazer et al. 2025 bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.08.22.671864). github.com/VisualPhysiologyDB/visual-physiology-opsin-db/tree/main/scripts_n_notebooks/vpod_ML_workflows/mine_n_match/data_sources/lmax/vpod
  3. Claes JM et al. 2014. Photon hunting in the twilight zone: visual features of mesopelagic bioluminescent sharks. PLoS ONE 9:e104213, Dataset S1. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104213
  4. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  5. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  6. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?