Open the tool

How does the tiger wandering spider see?

The tiger wandering spider (Cupiennius salei) is a spider in the order Araneae. Its eyes belong to the vision type Jumping spider.

Measured in this species: colour, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the tiger wandering spiderThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the tiger wandering spider (Cupiennius salei), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
3 receptor classes: 340 nm (UVS), 480 nm (MWS (green)), 520 nm (MWS (green))
measured in this species
Measured[1]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured
SharpnessAcuity
12 cycles per degree
group default: median of tier-A values in vision type V26 within phylum Arthropoda (1 species: Portia fimbriata)
Group default[2]
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
1
mode of species-v1 relatives in order Araneae: Portia fimbriata
Group default[2]
Fovea type
principal eyes: tiered retina (layer 1 = fovea-like)
Group default[2]
Night visionActivity pattern
nocturnal
mode of 1 rows (of 1 rows): nocturnal
Measured[1]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[1]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
6.5 Hz
median of 1 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [6.45])
Measured[3]

Related animals

More spiders: all spiders with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  2. species_v1:Williams & McIntyre 1980
  3. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  4. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  5. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?