How does the mourning dove see?
The mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) is a bird in the order Columbiformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Panoramic grain-eater and wader: 4 cones (violet-sensitive), low-moderate acuity, ~300-360 deg field, small binocular zone.
Measured in this species: sharpness, field of view, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.
See your photo as the mourning doveThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.
What stands out
- It has 4 colour receptor classes; people have 3.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 6.89 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- Its eyes cover about 316° around the head, with 9° seen by both eyes at once.
- It stops seeing flicker at 88.5 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks about 1.5 times slower to it.[10][12]
- Activity pattern: diurnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 4 receptor classes: 406.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 453 nm (SWS (blue)), 507 nm (MWS (green)), 567 nm (LWS (long)) receptor set of nearest measured relative Columba livia (same family Columbidae) | Estimated | [1][2] |
| Sharpness | Acuity 6.89 cycles per degree median of 1 anatomical-ganglion rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [3] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 9° median of 1 rows (eyes-at-rest rows preferred) | Measured | [4] |
| Total field of view 316° median species-v1 total field of family Columbidae: Columba livia | Estimated | [5] | |
| Blind area behind the head 44° | Estimated | [5] | |
| Eye placement lateral frontal if binocular overlap >= 60 deg, else lateral | Derived | [4] | |
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 1 retinal topography | Measured (not re-verified) | [6] |
| Fovea type single central fovea (displaced dorso-temporally from retinal centre) | Measured (not re-verified) | [6] | |
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal mode of 3 rows (of 3 rows): diurnal; not_nocturnal; photopic | Measured (not re-verified) | [7][8][9] |
| Rods vs cones cone-dominated nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [7][8][9] | |
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 88.5 Hz median of 1 relatives in family Columbidae: Columba livia | Estimated | [10][11] |
Other senses
- magnetoreception: NOT RENDERED (no agreed visual percept) (Group default)
Related animals
- Rock pigeon same vision type
- Chicken same vision type
- Canada goose same vision type
- Common ostrich same vision type
- Mallard same vision type
- Manx shearwater same vision type
More birds: all birds with measured vision data.
Sources
- Lind O, Mitkus M, Olsson P, Kelber A. 2014. Ultraviolet vision in birds: the importance of transparent eye media. Proc R Soc B 281:20132209. Table 1. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2209
- Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
- Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
- Tyrrell LP, Fernandez-Juricic E 2017. Avian binocular vision: it's not just about what birds can see, it's also about what they can't. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0173235. S1 Table.. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173235
- species_v1:Martin & Young 1983
- Moore BA, Tyrrell LP, Pita D, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Fernandez-Juricic E 2017. Does retinal configuration make the head and eyes of foveate birds move? Sci Rep 7: 38406. Appendix 1.. doi.org/10.1038/srep38406
- Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W. 2014. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world's birds and mammals. Ecology 95:2027. BirdFuncDat.txt. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3559887.v1
- Schmitz L, Motani R. 2011. Science 332:705-708, SOM. doi.org/10.1126/science.1200043
- Moura et al. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biol 22:e3002658. TetrapodTraits v3.0.1.. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22536349
- Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
- Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
- Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?