Yellowfin tuna vision: the science and the numbers
Thunnus albacares · order Perciformes · Fish: all the numbers
The yellowfin tuna has 2 colour receptor classes (426 and 485 nm): mainly blues and yellows; reds and greens look alike.[1][2] Its sharpest vision resolves 16.4 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[7] The yellowfin tuna stops seeing flicker at 80 Hz, against 60 Hz for people.[27]
- 2colour receptor classesMeasured
- 16.4cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
- 80hertz flicker fusion (motion)Measured
The yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) is a fish in the order Perciformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Shallow-water fish tetrachromat: four cone types including ultraviolet and far red. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What the yellowfin tuna sees: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has two colour receptor classes (a dichromat): reds and greens fall on one axis, as in red-green colour blindness in people.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 16.4 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- It stops seeing flicker at 80 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks about 1.3 times slower to it.[28][29]
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 2 receptor classes: 426 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 485 nm (MWS (green)) measured in this species | Measured | [1][2] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[3][4][5][6] |
| Sharpness | Acuity 16.4 cycles per degree median of 1 behavioural rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [7] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[8][9] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 32.85° group default: median of tier-A values in vision type the "Shallow-water fish tetrachromat" type within phylum Chordata (2 species: Danio rerio, Notemigonus crysoleucas) | Group default | [10] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[11][12] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[13] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[13] Eye placement: frontal Derived[11][12] |
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 0 mode of species-v1 relatives in order Perciformes: Toxotes jaculatrix | Group default | [14] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[15] Fovea type: fovea Measured[15] |
| Fovea type ventrotemporal area (high rgc density) | Group default | [14] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type the "Shallow-water fish tetrachromat" type within phylum Chordata (224 species: Amphiprion ocellaris, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, Acanthurus bahianus, Acanthurus… | Group default | [16][17] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[18][19][20][3][21][22][23][17] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[24][25] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[26] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[18][19][20][3][21][22][23][17] |
| Rods vs cones cone-dominated | Group default | [16][17] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 80 Hz median of 1 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [80.0]) | Measured | [27] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[28][29] |
All fish side by side: Fish: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Schweikert et al. 2018
- VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda… 2025
- Longcore 2023
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Caves et al. 2017
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Pita et al. 2015
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Temple et al. 2010
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Froese et al.
- Moura et al. 2024
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Lafitte et al. 2022
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.