How does the common evening brown see?
The common evening brown (Melanitis leda) is a insect in the order Lepidoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Butterfly multispectral.
Measured in this species: sharpness and motion (flicker fusion). Measured colour or sharpness: a measured receptor set or acuity in this species; other dials come from relatives or group defaults. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.
See your photo as the common evening brownThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.
What stands out
- It has 8 colour receptor classes, including ultraviolet; people have 3.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 0.35 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- It stops seeing flicker at 200.9 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks about 3.3 times slower to it.[10][11]
- Activity pattern: diurnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 8 receptor classes: 335 nm (UVS), 336 nm (UVS), 430 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 430 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 535 nm (MWS (green)), 549 nm (LWS (long)), 580 nm (LWS (long)), 617.5 nm (LWS (long)) receptor set of nearest measured relative Charaxes jasius (same family Nymphalidae) | Estimated | [1][2][3] |
| Ultraviolet yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet | Estimated | ||
| Sharpness | Acuity 0.35 cycles per degree median of 1 optical rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [4] |
| Angle between facets 1.44° minimum (acute-zone) interommatidial angle over sources; within caves2018: minimum (round-1 rule: mean of horizontal and vertical when both exist) | Measured | [4] | |
| Eye type compound eye | |||
| Field of view | No value in the catalogue. | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 0 median of 91 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina | Group default | [5] |
| Fovea type none | Group default | [5] | |
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal mode of 15 relatives in family Nymphalidae: Pararge aegeria, Polygonia c-album, Danaus plexippus, Heliconius melpomene, Melitaea cinxia, Aglais urticae | Estimated | [6][7][8] |
| Rods vs cones no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors) | Estimated | [6][7][8] | |
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 200.9 Hz median of 1 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [200.9]) | Measured | [9] |
Related animals
- Asian swallowtail same vision type
- Coffee bee hawkmoth same vision type
- Common bluebottle butterfly same vision type
- Common eggfly same vision type
- Monarch butterfly same vision type
- Small white same vision type
More insects: all insects with measured vision data.
Sources
- Pirih P, Ilić M, Meglič A et al. 2022. Opponent processing in the retinal mosaic of nymphalid butterflies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0275
- Pirih P et al. 2022. Opponent processing in the retinal mosaic of nymphalid butterflies. Phil Trans R Soc B. Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqkq. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqkq
- Belušič G, Ilić M, Meglič A et al. 2021. Red-green opponency in the long visual fibre photoreceptors of brushfoot butterflies (Nymphalidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1560
- Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
- Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
- Feuda R, Marletaz F, Bentley MA, Holland PWH. 2016. Conservation, duplication, and divergence of five opsin genes in insect evolution. Genome Biol Evol 8:579-587
- Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
- Sondhi Y, Ellis EA, Bybee SM, Theobald JC, Kawahara AY. 2021. Light environment drives evolution of color vision genes in butterflies and moths. Commun Biol 4:177
- Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
- Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
- Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?