Open the tool

How does the monarch butterfly see?

The monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is a insect in the order Lepidoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Butterfly multispectral.

Measured in this species: colour and night vision. Measured colour or sharpness: a measured receptor set or acuity in this species; other dials come from relatives or group defaults. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the monarch butterflyThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
8 receptor classes: 330 nm (UVS), 337.5 nm (UVS), 435 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 450 nm (SWS (blue)), 525 nm (MWS (green)), 537.5 nm (MWS (green)), 570 nm (LWS (long)), 610 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured (not re-verified)[1][2][3]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Measured (not re-verified)
SharpnessAcuity
0.52 cycles per degree
median of 20 relatives in family Nymphalidae: Caligo memnon, Caligo eurilochus, Asterocampa leilia, Morpho peleides, Parthenos sylvia, Polygonia c-album
Estimated[4][5][6][7]
Angle between facets
0.98°
median of 9 relatives in family Nymphalidae: Caligo memnon, Caligo eurilochus, Asterocampa leilia, Morpho peleides, Parthenos sylvia, Polygonia c-album
Estimated[4]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
median of 91 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina
Group default[8]
Fovea type
none
Group default[8]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 2 rows (of 2 rows): diurnal
Measured[9][10]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[9][10]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
187.5 Hz
median of 1 relatives in genus Danaus: Danaus chrysippus
Estimated[11]

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Pirih P et al. 2022. Opponent processing in the retinal mosaic of nymphalid butterflies. Phil Trans R Soc B. Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqkq. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqkq
  2. van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K, Belusic G, Kelber A. 2021. Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435-461. Supplementary table. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
  3. Belušič G, Ilić M, Meglič A et al. 2021. Red-green opponency in the long visual fibre photoreceptors of brushfoot butterflies (Nymphalidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1560
  4. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  5. AndrewPMeade/FabricTools, sciphy/data_utils/datasets/Arthropod.CompoundEyes.csv (acuity, body length, light, media for 281 arthropods; columns match Feller et al. 2021 Arthropod Struct Dev 60:101002). github.com/AndrewPMeade/FabricTools
  6. Feller KD, Sharkey CR, McDuffee-Altekruse A, Bracken-Grissom HD, Lord NP, Porter ML, Schweikert LE 2021. Surf and turf vision: patterns and predictors of visual acuity in compound eye evolution. Arthropod Structure & Development 60:101002. doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2020.101002
  7. Wright DS, Manel AN, Guachamin-Rosero M, Chamba-Vaca P, Bacquet CN, Merrill RM 2023. Quantifying visual acuity in Heliconius butterflies. Biology Letters. zenodo.org/records/10127023
  8. Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
  9. Feuda R, Marletaz F, Bentley MA, Holland PWH. 2016. Conservation, duplication, and divergence of five opsin genes in insect evolution. Genome Biol Evol 8:579-587
  10. Sondhi Y, Ellis EA, Bybee SM, Theobald JC, Kawahara AY. 2021. Light environment drives evolution of color vision genes in butterflies and moths. Commun Biol 4:177
  11. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  12. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  13. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?