See Like Animals Open the tool

Grey whale vision: the science and the numbers

Eschrichtius robustus · order Cetacea · Mammals: all the numbers

Its sharpest vision resolves 2.7 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6] Its activity pattern is cathemeral.[15][16][17][18][19]

  • 2.7cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured

The grey whale (Eschrichtius robustus) is a mammal in the order Cetacea. Its eyes belong to the vision type Small prey mammal (UV): two or three cone types, often including ultraviolet, low sharpness and a near-panoramic field. Measured in this species: sharpness, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.

This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.

What the grey whale sees: colour receptors

Grey whale colour receptor peaks, 300 to 700 nmGrey whale: 1 receptor peak at 524 nm; you: 3 at 421.5, 532, 558.4 nm. ultraviolet300400500600700
Grey whale: 524 nmPeople: 421.5, 532, 558.4 nmWavelength in nanometres

What stands out

  • Its sharpest vision resolves 2.7 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
  • Activity pattern: cathemeral.

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.

Vision values for the grey whale (Eschrichtius robustus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSourcesPeople
ColourColour receptors
1 receptor class: 524 nm (MWS (green))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Tursiops truncatus (same order Cetacea)
Group default[1]Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[2][3][4][5]
SharpnessAcuity
2.7 cycles per degree
median of 1 anatomical-ganglion rows (method priority rule)
Measured[6]Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
75°
median of 41 relatives in class Mammalia: Octodon degus, Octodon lunatus, Equus caballus, Ovis aries, Bos taurus, Capra hircus
Group default[9][10][11][12]Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[9][10]
Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[13]
Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[13]
Eye placement: frontal Derived[9][10]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
fovea_present / area_centralis_type (retinal topography; count 1 = fovea present, 0 = none)
Measured[14]Number of foveas: 1 Measured[14]
Fovea type: fovea Measured[14]
Fovea type
area centralis
Measured[14]
Night visionActivity pattern
cathemeral
mode of 4 rows (of 5 rows): arrhythmic/cathemeral; cathemeral; diurnal/crepuscular; mixed (nocturnal/crepuscular, cathemeral, crepuscular or diurnal/crepuscular)
Measured (not re-verified)[15][16][17][18][19]Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[15][20][16][2][17][18][21][19]
Pupil shape: vertical Group default[22][23]
Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[24]
Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[15][20][16][2][17][18][21][19]
Rods vs cones
mixed
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[15][16][17][18][19]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
60 Hz
median of 21 relatives in class Mammalia: Rattus norvegicus, Cavia porcellus, Mus musculus, Felis catus, Macaca mulatta, Macaca nemestrina
Group default[25][26][27][28]Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[26][27]

All mammals side by side: Mammals: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.

Sources

  1. Frazer et al. 2024
  2. Longcore 2023
  3. Kirwan
  4. Müller et al. 2009
  5. Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
  6. Kirk et al. 2004
  7. Kirk et al. 2004
  8. Veilleux et al. 2014
  9. Heesy 2004
  10. Heffner et al. 1992
  11. Vega-Zuniga et al. 2013
  12. Vega-Zuniga et al. 2017
  13. Campbell & Green 1965
  14. Kopania et al. 2025
  15. Anderson et al. 2017
  16. Wilman et al. 2014
  17. Maor et al. 2017
  18. Jones et al. 2009
  19. Moura et al. 2024
  20. Borges et al. 2018
  21. Schmitz et al. 2011
  22. Banks et al. 2015
  23. Cervino et al. 2021
  24. Guareschi et al. 2025
  25. Haarlem et al. 2026
  26. Healy et al. 2013
  27. Inger et al. 2014
  28. Lafitte et al. 2022

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.