See Like Animals Open the tool
Menu

Jamacian fruit-eating bat vision: the science and the numbers

Artibeus jamaicensis · order Chiroptera · Mammals: all the numbers

Its sharpest vision resolves 0.17 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6][7][8] Its activity pattern is nocturnal.[13][14][15][16][17][8]

See it on your photoBack to How does the jamacian fruit-eating bat see?
  • 0.17cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured

The jamacian fruit-eating bat (Artibeus jamaicensis) is a mammal in the order Chiroptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Nocturnal mammal (primate, bat): rod-dominated eyes with few working cone types and low sharpness. Measured in this species: sharpness, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.

This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.

Method: How we know what animals see (the See Like Animals vision engine) · Sources · Last updated . Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

What the jamacian fruit-eating bat sees: colour receptors

Jamacian fruit-eating bat colour receptor peaks, 300 to 700 nmJamacian fruit-eating bat: 2 receptor peaks at 365, 540 nm; you: 3 at 421.5, 532, 558.4 nm. ultraviolet300400500600700
Jamacian fruit-eating bat: 365, 540 nmPeople: 421.5, 532, 558.4 nmWavelength in nanometres

What stands out

  • Its sharpest vision resolves 0.17 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
  • Activity pattern: nocturnal.

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.

Vision values for the jamacian fruit-eating bat (Artibeus jamaicensis), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSourcesPeople
ColourColour receptors
2 receptor classes: 365 nm (UVS), 540 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Glossophaga soricina (same family Phyllostomidae)
Estimated[1][2]Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[1][3][4][5]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet		Estimated
SharpnessAcuity
0.17 cycles per degree
median of 3 behavioural rows (method priority rule)
Measured[6][7][8]Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
108°
median of 1 relatives in order Chiroptera: Pteropus poliocephalus
Group default[9]Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[9][10]
Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[11]
Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[11]
Eye placement: frontal Derived[9][10]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
fovea_present / area_centralis_type (retinal topography; count 1 = fovea present, 0 = none)
Measured[12]Number of foveas: 1 Measured[12]
Fovea type: fovea Measured[12]
Fovea type
area centralis, horizontal streak		Measured[12]
Night visionActivity pattern
nocturnal
mode of 6 rows (of 6 rows): nocturnal
Measured (not re-verified)[13][14][15][16][17][8]Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[13][14][15][1][16][18][19][17]
Pupil shape: vertical Group default[20][21]
Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[22]
Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[13][14][15][1][16][18][19][17]
Rods vs cones
rod-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[13][14][15][16][17][8]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
60 Hz
median of 21 relatives in class Mammalia: Rattus norvegicus, Cavia porcellus, Mus musculus, Felis catus, Macaca mulatta, Macaca nemestrina
Group default[23][24][25][26]Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[24][25]

All mammals side by side: Mammals: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.

Sources

  1. Longcore 2023
  2. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda… 2025
  3. Kirwan
  4. Müller et al. 2009
  5. Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
  6. de Sousa et al. 2022
  7. Kirk et al. 2004
  8. Veilleux et al. 2014
  9. Heesy 2004
  10. Heffner et al. 1992
  11. Campbell & Green 1965
  12. Kopania et al. 2025
  13. Anderson et al. 2017
  14. Borges et al. 2018
  15. Wilman et al. 2014
  16. Maor et al. 2017
  17. Moura et al. 2024
  18. Jones et al. 2009
  19. Schmitz et al. 2011
  20. Banks et al. 2015
  21. Cervino et al. 2021
  22. Guareschi et al. 2025
  23. Haarlem et al. 2026
  24. Healy et al. 2013
  25. Inger et al. 2014
  26. Lafitte et al. 2022

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.