Mongolian jird vision: the science and the numbers
Meriones unguiculatus · order Rodentia · Mammals: all the numbers
Gerbils have 3 colour receptor classes (360, 493 and 512 nm), one of them in the ultraviolet.[1][2] Their sharpest vision resolves 1.8 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6] Both eyes see the same 48° in front of them.[8]
- 3colour receptor classesMeasured
- 1.8cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
- 48°seen by both eyesMeasured
The Mongolian jird (Meriones unguiculatus) is a mammal in the order Rodentia. Its eyes belong to the vision type Small prey mammal (UV): two or three cone types, often including ultraviolet, low sharpness and a near-panoramic field. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, field of view, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What gerbils see: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has three colour receptor classes, like most people, but one of them sees ultraviolet.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 1.8 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- Both eyes see the same 48° in front of it (binocular overlap), where depth is judged best.
- Activity pattern: cathemeral.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 3 receptor classes: 360 nm (UVS), 493 nm (MWS (green)), 512 nm (MWS (green)) measured in this species | Measured | [1][2] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[1][3][4][5] |
| Ultraviolet yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet | Measured | |||
| Sharpness | Acuity 1.8 cycles per degree median of 1 behavioural rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][6] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 48° median of 1 rows (eyes-at-rest rows preferred) | Measured | [8] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[9][8] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[10] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[10] Eye placement: frontal Derived[9][8] |
| Eye placement lateral frontal if binocular overlap >= 60 deg, else lateral | Derived | [8] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 0 fovea_present / area_centralis_type (retinal topography; count 1 = fovea present, 0 = none) | Measured | [11] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[11] Fovea type: fovea Measured[11] |
| Fovea type horizontal streak | Measured | [11] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern cathemeral mode of 5 rows (of 6 rows): cathemeral; mixed (nocturnal/crepuscular, cathemeral, crepuscular or diurnal/crepuscular) | Measured (not re-verified) | [12][1][13][14][15][6] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[16][17][12][1][13][14][18][15] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[19][20] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[21] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[16][17][12][1][13][14][18][15] |
| Pupil shape circular | Group default | [19] | ||
| Reflective layer (tapetum) no | Estimated | [22][23] | ||
| Rods vs cones mixed nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [12][1][13][14][15][6] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 46.15 Hz median of 2 relatives in family Muridae: Rattus norvegicus, Mus musculus | Estimated | [24] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[25][26] |
All mammals side by side: Mammals: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Longcore 2023
- VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda… 2025
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Heesy 2004
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Moura et al. 2024
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Healy et al. 2013
- Nomura et al. 2019
- Lafitte et al. 2022
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.