Northern tree shrew vision: the science and the numbers
Tupaia belangeri · order Scandentia · Mammals: all the numbers
The northern tree shrew has 2 colour receptor classes (444 and 556 nm): mainly blues and yellows; reds and greens look alike.[1] Its sharpest vision resolves 2.1 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6][7] The northern tree shrew stops seeing flicker at 60 Hz, against 60 Hz for people.[24]
- 2colour receptor classesMeasured*
- 2.1cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
- 60hertz flicker fusion (motion)Measured
The northern tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) is a mammal in the order Scandentia. Its eyes belong to the vision type Day dichromat mammal: two cone types (blue and yellow, so reds and greens merge), moderate sharpness and a horizontal band of sharp vision. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What the northern tree shrew sees: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has two colour receptor classes (a dichromat): reds and greens fall on one axis, as in red-green colour blindness in people.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 2.1 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- It stops seeing flicker at 60 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks about the same.[25][24]
- Activity pattern: diurnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 2 receptor classes: 444 nm (SWS (blue)), 556 nm (LWS (long)) species-v1.csv value measured in this species (not in tidy tables) | Measured (not re-verified) | [1] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[2][3][4][5] |
| Sharpness | Acuity 2.1 cycles per degree median of 2 behavioural rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6][7] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 60° median of 1 relatives in genus Tupaia: Tupaia glis | Estimated | [9] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[9][10] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[11] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[11] Eye placement: frontal Derived[9][10] |
| Total field of view 250° group default: median total field of vision type the "Day dichromat mammal" type within phylum Chordata in species-v1: Canis familiaris | Group default | [12] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 0 median of 1 relatives in genus Tupaia: Tupaia glis | Estimated | [13] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[13] Fovea type: fovea Measured[13] |
| Fovea type area centralis, horizontal streak | Estimated | [13] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal mode of 4 rows (of 4 rows): diurnal | Measured (not re-verified) | [14][15][16][8] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[17][18][14][2][15][19][20][16] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[21][22] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[23] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[17][18][14][2][15][19][20][16] |
| Rods vs cones cone-dominated nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [14][15][16][8] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 60 Hz median of 1 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [60.0]) | Measured | [24] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[25][24] |
All mammals side by side: Mammals: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Jacobs & Neitz 1986
- Longcore 2023
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Caves et al. 2024
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Miller & Murphy 1995
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Moura et al. 2024
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Jones et al. 2009
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Inger et al. 2014
- Healy et al. 2013
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.