See Like Animals Open the tool

Ring-tailed lemur vision: the science and the numbers

Lemur catta · order Primates · Mammals: all the numbers

The ring-tailed lemur has 2 colour receptor classes (437 and 545 nm): mainly blues and yellows; reds and greens look alike.[1] Its sharpest vision resolves 6.525 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[5][6]

  • 2colour receptor classesMeasured
  • 6.525cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured

The ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) is a mammal in the order Primates. Its eyes belong to the vision type Day dichromat mammal: two cone types (blue and yellow, so reds and greens merge), moderate sharpness and a horizontal band of sharp vision. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.

This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.

What the ring-tailed lemur sees: colour receptors

Ring-tailed lemur colour receptor peaks, 300 to 700 nmRing-tailed lemur: 2 receptor peaks at 437, 545 nm; you: 3 at 421.5, 532, 558.4 nm. ultraviolet300400500600700
Ring-tailed lemur: 437, 545 nmPeople: 421.5, 532, 558.4 nmWavelength in nanometres

What stands out

  • It has two colour receptor classes (a dichromat): reds and greens fall on one axis, as in red-green colour blindness in people.
  • Its sharpest vision resolves 6.525 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
  • Activity pattern: diurnal.

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.

Vision values for the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSourcesPeople
ColourColour receptors
2 receptor classes: 437 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 545 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured[1]Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[1][2][3][4]
SharpnessAcuity
6.525 cycles per degree
median of 2 behavioural rows (method priority rule)
Measured[5][6]Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[5][6]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
137°
median of 6 relatives in order Primates: Otolemur crassicaudatus, Cephalopachus bancanus, Aotus trivirgatus, Saimiri sciureus, Macaca mulatta, Homo sapiens
Group default[7][8]Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[7][8]
Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[9]
Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[9]
Eye placement: frontal Derived[7][8]
Total field of view
200°
median species-v1 total field of order Primates: Homo sapiens
Group default[9]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
fovea_present / area_centralis_type (retinal topography; count 1 = fovea present, 0 = none)
Measured[10]Number of foveas: 1 Measured[10]
Fovea type: fovea Measured[10]
Fovea type
area centralis
Measured[10]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 9 rows (of 10 rows): cathemeral; diurnal; mixed (nocturnal/crepuscular, cathemeral, crepuscular or diurnal/crepuscular); photopic
Measured (not re-verified)[11][12][1][13][14][15][16][6]Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[11][17][12][1][13][14][15][16]
Pupil shape: vertical Group default[18][19]
Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[20]
Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[11][17][12][1][13][14][15][16]
Rods vs cones
cone-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[11][12][1][13][14][15][16][6]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
69 Hz
median of 3 relatives in order Primates: Macaca mulatta, Macaca nemestrina, Homo sapiens
Group default[21][22][23]Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[21][22]

All mammals side by side: Mammals: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.

Sources

  1. Longcore 2023
  2. Kirwan
  3. Müller et al. 2009
  4. Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
  5. Kirk et al. 2004
  6. Veilleux et al. 2014
  7. Heesy 2004
  8. Heffner et al. 1992
  9. Campbell & Green 1965
  10. Kopania et al. 2025
  11. Anderson et al. 2017
  12. Wilman et al. 2014
  13. Maor et al. 2017
  14. Jones et al. 2009
  15. Schmitz et al. 2011
  16. Moura et al. 2024
  17. Borges et al. 2018
  18. Banks et al. 2015
  19. Cervino et al. 2021
  20. Guareschi et al. 2025
  21. Healy et al. 2013
  22. Inger et al. 2014
  23. Lafitte et al. 2022

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.