Chilean tinamou vision: the science and the numbers
Nothoprocta perdicaria · order Tinamiformes · Birds: all the numbers
The Chilean tinamou has four colour channels, including ultraviolet (371, 440, 499 and 566 nm).[1][2] Its sharpest vision resolves 14 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6]
- 4colour receptor classesMeasured
- 14cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
The Chilean tinamou (Nothoprocta perdicaria) is a bird in the order Tinamiformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Panoramic grain-eater and wader: four cone types, low to moderate sharpness and an almost all-round field of view. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What the Chilean tinamou sees: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has 4 colour receptor classes, including ultraviolet; people have 3.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 14 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- Activity pattern: diurnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 4 receptor classes: 371 nm (UVS), 440 nm (SWS (blue)), 499 nm (MWS (green)), 566 nm (LWS (long)) measured in this species | Measured | [1][2] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[2][3][4][5] |
| Ultraviolet yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet | Measured | |||
| Sharpness | Acuity 14 cycles per degree median of 1 anatomical-ganglion rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 27.5° median of 133 relatives in class Aves: Accipiter cooperii, Spatula clypeata, Mareca penelope, Anas platyrhynchos, Ardeola ralloides, Baeolophus bicolor | Group default | [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[18][19] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[20] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[20] Eye placement: frontal Derived[18][19] |
| Total field of view 338° group default: median total field of vision type the "Panoramic grain-eater and wader" type within phylum Chordata in species-v1: Columba livia, Scolopax minor | Group default | [21][22] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 1 median of 48 relatives in class Aves: Branta canadensis, Cardinalis cardinalis, Passerina cyanea, Zenaida macroura, Cyanocitta cristata, Junco hyemalis | Group default | [23][24][25] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[26] Fovea type: fovea Measured[26] |
| Fovea type single central fovea (displaced dorso-temporally from retinal centre) | Group default | [23][24][25] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal mode of 4 rows (of 4 rows): diurnal; not_nocturnal | Measured (not re-verified) | [27][28][2][29] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[30][31][32][2][33][34][35][29] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[36][37] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[38] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[30][31][32][2][33][34][35][29] |
| Rods vs cones cone-dominated nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [27][28][2][29] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 88.5 Hz median of 17 relatives in class Aves: Bubo virginianus, Melopsittacus undulatus, Passer domesticus, Taeniopygia guttata, Columba livia, Calypte anna | Group default | [39][40][41][42][43] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[41][42] |
All birds side by side: Birds: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Lind et al. 2014
- Longcore 2023
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Caves et al. 2018
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Cantlay et al. 2023
- Lucas et al. 2024
- Vision et al. 2026
- Pecsics et al. 2023
- Portugal et al. 2023
- Potier et al. 2018
- Potier et al. 2023
- Tyrrell et al. 2017
- Tyrrell et al. 2017
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Martin & Young 1983
- Martin 1994
- Moore et al. 2017
- Potier et al. 2017
- Rodrigues et al. 2026
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Light conditions and the evolution of…
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Moura et al. 2024
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Boström et al. 2016
- Haarlem et al. 2026
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
- Lafitte et al. 2022
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.