Little owl vision: the science and the numbers
Athene noctua · order Strigiformes · Birds: all the numbers
Its sharpest vision resolves 6.5 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6] Both eyes see the same 41° in front of it.[9] The little owl stops seeing flicker at 50 Hz, against 60 Hz for people.[33]
- 6.5cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
- 41°seen by both eyesMeasured
- 50hertz flicker fusion (motion)Measured
The little owl (Athene noctua) is a bird in the order Strigiformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Owl and night bird: rod-dominated eyes built for dim light, with low sharpness. Measured in this species: sharpness, field of view, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What the little owl sees: colour receptors
What stands out
- Its sharpest vision resolves 6.5 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- Both eyes see the same 41° in front of it (binocular overlap), where depth is judged best.
- It stops seeing flicker at 50 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks choppier to it.[34][35]
- Activity pattern: nocturnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 3 receptor classes: 463 nm (SWS (blue)), 530 nm (MWS (green)), 555 nm (LWS (long)) receptor set of nearest measured relative Strix aluco (same family Strigidae) | Estimated | [1][2] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[1][3][4][5] |
| Sharpness | Acuity 6.5 cycles per degree median of 1 electrophysiological rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 41° median of 1 rows (eyes-at-rest rows preferred) | Measured | [9] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[10][11] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[12] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[12] Eye placement: frontal Derived[10][11] |
| Total field of view 201° median species-v1 total field of family Strigidae: Strix aluco | Estimated | [13] | ||
| Blind area behind the head 159° | Estimated | [13] | ||
| Eye placement lateral frontal if binocular overlap >= 60 deg, else lateral | Derived | [9] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 1 median of 48 relatives in class Aves: Branta canadensis, Cardinalis cardinalis, Passerina cyanea, Zenaida macroura, Cyanocitta cristata, Junco hyemalis | Group default | [14][15][16] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[17] Fovea type: fovea Measured[17] |
| Fovea type single central fovea (displaced dorso-temporally from retinal centre) | Group default | [14][15][16] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern nocturnal mode of 4 rows (of 4 rows): cathemeral; nocturnal | Measured (not re-verified) | [18][19][20][21] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[22][23][24][1][25][26][27][21] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[28][29] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[30] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[22][23][24][1][25][26][27][21] |
| Reflective layer (tapetum) no | Estimated | [31][32] | ||
| Rods vs cones rod-dominated nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [18][19][20][21] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 50 Hz median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [50.0]) | Measured | [33] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[34][35] |
All birds side by side: Birds: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Longcore 2023
- VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda… 2025
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Potier et al. 2020
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Potier et al. 2023
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Martin 1984
- Moore et al. 2017
- Potier et al. 2017
- Rodrigues et al. 2026
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Light conditions and the evolution of…
- Choiniere et al. 2021
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Moura et al. 2024
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Healy et al. 2013
- Martin 1977
- Lafitte et al. 2022
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.