Asian palm weevil vision: the science and the numbers
Rhynchophorus ferrugineus · order Coleoptera · Insects: all the numbers
The Asian palm weevil has four colour channels, including ultraviolet (366, 521, 537 and 564 nm).[1] Its sharpest vision resolves 0.33 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6] The Asian palm weevil stops seeing flicker at 100 Hz, against 60 Hz for people.[28]
- 4colour receptor classesMeasured
- 0.33cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
- 100hertz flicker fusion (motion)Measured
The Asian palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus) is an insect in the order Coleoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Bee, ant and locust UV trichromat: three receptor types (ultraviolet, blue and green, no red), a low-resolution compound eye and fast motion vision. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What the Asian palm weevil sees: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has 4 colour receptor classes, including ultraviolet; people have 3.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 0.33 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- It stops seeing flicker at 100 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks about 1.7 times slower to it.[29][30]
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 4 receptor classes: 366 nm (UVS), 521 nm (MWS (green)), 537 nm (MWS (green)), 564 nm (LWS (long)) measured in this species | Measured | [1] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[2][3][4][5] |
| Ultraviolet yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet | Measured | |||
| Sharpness | Acuity 0.33 cycles per degree median of 1 compilation rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8] |
| Angle between facets 3.27° median of 13 relatives in order Coleoptera: Anoplognathus pallidicollis, Cicindela hybrida, Cantharis livida, Photuris versicolor, Onitis alexis, Coccinella septempunctata | Group default | [9] | ||
| Eye type compound eye | ||||
| Field of view | No value in the catalogue. | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[10][11] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[12] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[12] Eye placement: frontal Derived[10][11] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 0 median of 91 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina | Group default | [13] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[14] Fovea type: fovea Measured[14] |
| Fovea type none | Group default | [13] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal group default: mode of tier-A values in vision type the "Bee, ant and locust UV trichromat" type within phylum Arthropoda (92 species: Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris, Cataglyphis bicolor, Bombus impatiens… | Group default | [15][16][2][17] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[18][19][20][2][21][22][23][24] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[25][26] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[27] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[18][19][20][2][21][22][23][24] |
| Rods vs cones no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors) | Group default | [15][16][2][17] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 100 Hz median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [100.0]) | Measured | [28] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[29][30] |
All insects side by side: Insects: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG… 2021
- Longcore 2023
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Feller et al. 2021
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Caves et al. 2018
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Comparative data for dance fly eye…
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Johnson et al. 2022
- Feuda et al. 2016
- Meiri 2024. SquamBase: a database of…
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Moura et al. 2024
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Haarlem et al. 2026
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.