Open the tool

How does the common jezebel see?

The common jezebel (Delias eucharis) is a insect in the order Lepidoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Butterfly multispectral.

Measured in this species: motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the common jezebelThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the common jezebel (Delias eucharis), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
11 receptor classes: 361 nm (UVS), 413 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 413 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 453 nm (SWS (blue)), 458.5 nm (SWS (blue)), 520 nm (MWS (green)), 558 nm (LWS (long)), 560 nm (LWS (long)), 620 nm (LWS (long)), 651 nm (LWS (long)), 662 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Colias erate (same family Pieridae)
Estimated[1][2][3]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Estimated
SharpnessAcuity
0.51 cycles per degree
median of 3 relatives in family Pieridae: Colias eurytheme, Pieris brassicae, Appias lyncida
Estimated[4][5]
Angle between facets
1.26°
median of 2 relatives in family Pieridae: Colias eurytheme, Pieris brassicae
Estimated[4]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
median of 91 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina
Group default[6]
Fovea type
none
Group default[6]
Night visionActivity pattern
diurnal
mode of 8 relatives in family Pieridae: Anthocharis cardamines, Colias croceus, Phoebis sennae, Colias erate, Gonepteryx aspasia, Pieris brassicae
Estimated[3][7]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
Estimated[3][7]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
140.4 Hz
median of 1 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [140.4])
Measured[8]

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. Pirih P, Arikawa K, Stavenga D 2010. An expanded set of photoreceptors in the Eastern Pale Clouded Yellow butterfly, Colias erate. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0538-0
  2. van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K, Belusic G, Kelber A. 2021. Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435-461. Supplementary table. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
  3. Longcore T. 2023. A compendium of photopigment peak sensitivities and visual spectral response curves of terrestrial wildlife to guide design of outdoor nighttime lighting. Basic Appl Ecol 73:40-50. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2023.09.002. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432720
  4. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  5. Feller KD, Sharkey CR, McDuffee-Altekruse A, Bracken-Grissom HD, Lord NP, Porter ML, Schweikert LE 2021. Surf and turf vision: patterns and predictors of visual acuity in compound eye evolution. Arthropod Structure & Development 60:101002. doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2020.101002
  6. Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
  7. Sondhi Y, Ellis EA, Bybee SM, Theobald JC, Kawahara AY. 2021. Light environment drives evolution of color vision genes in butterflies and moths. Commun Biol 4:177
  8. Haarlem CS, Hynes C, Jackson AL, Mitchell KJ, O'Connell RG, Healy K. 2026. Pace of ecology drives the tempo of visual perception across the animal kingdom. Nature Ecology & Evolution (doi:10.1038/s41559-026-02994-7). Figshare dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475. doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30556475
  9. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018
  10. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?