Elephant hawk-moth vision: the science and the numbers
Deilephila elpenor · order Lepidoptera · Insects: all the numbers
The elephant hawk-moth has 3 colour receptor classes (346.2, 442.5 and 521.2 nm), one of them in the ultraviolet.[1][2] Its sharpest vision resolves 0.25 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6]
- 3colour receptor classesMeasured
- 0.25cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
The elephant hawk-moth (Deilephila elpenor) is an insect in the order Lepidoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Colour or navigation at night: light-hungry eyes that keep colour vision or navigation working at night. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What the elephant hawk-moth sees: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has three colour receptor classes, like most people, but one of them sees ultraviolet.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 0.25 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- Activity pattern: nocturnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 3 receptor classes: 346.2 nm (UVS), 442.5 nm (SWS (blue)), 521.2 nm (MWS (green)) measured in this species | Measured | [1][2] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[1][3][4][5] |
| Ultraviolet yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet | Measured | |||
| Sharpness | Acuity 0.25 cycles per degree median of 1 compilation rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8] |
| Angle between facets 1.42° minimum (acute-zone) interommatidial angle over sources; within currea2023_oda: minimum (round-1 rule: mean of horizontal and vertical when both exist) | Measured (not re-verified) | [9] | ||
| Eye type compound eye | ||||
| Field of view | No value in the catalogue. | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[10][11] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[12] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[12] Eye placement: frontal Derived[10][11] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 0 median of 91 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina | Group default | [13] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[14] Fovea type: fovea Measured[14] |
| Fovea type none | Group default | [13] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern nocturnal mode of 1 rows (of 1 rows): nocturnal | Measured | [1] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[15][16][17][1][18][19][20][21] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[22][23] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[24] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[15][16][17][1][18][19][20][21] |
| Rods vs cones no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors) nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [1] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 126.85 Hz median of 6 relatives in family Sphingidae: Daphnis nerii, Acherontia styx, Agrius convolvuli, Cephonodes hylas, Macroglossum limata, Psilogramma increta | Estimated | [25][26] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[27][28] |
All insects side by side: Insects: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Longcore 2023
- van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG… 2021
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Feller et al. 2021
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Currea et al. 2023
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Comparative data for dance fly eye…
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Moura et al. 2024
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Haarlem et al. 2026
- Lafitte et al. 2022
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.