Open the tool

How does the emperor see?

The emperor (Saturnia pavonia) is a insect in the order Lepidoptera. Its eyes belong to the vision type Butterfly multispectral.

Measured in this species: motion (flicker fusion). One measured dial: a value other than colour or sharpness is measured in this species; colour and sharpness are not measured here. Every value below carries its evidence level and sources; nothing is typed by hand.

See your photo as the emperorThis species is part of the full catalogue in the tool (full unlock). Your photo stays on your device.

What stands out

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula.

Vision values for the emperor (Saturnia pavonia), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSources
ColourColour receptors
4 receptor classes: 380 nm (UVS), 460 nm (SWS (blue)), 540 nm (LWS (long)), 580 nm (LWS (long))
receptor set of nearest measured relative Actias artemis (same family Saturniidae)
Estimated[1]
Ultraviolet
yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet
Estimated
SharpnessAcuity
0.42 cycles per degree
median of 43 relatives in order Lepidoptera: Battus philenor, Colias eurytheme, Caligo memnon, Caligo eurilochus, Asterocampa leilia, Morpho peleides
Group default[2][3][4][5][6]
Angle between facets
1.38°
median of 21 relatives in order Lepidoptera: Battus philenor, Colias eurytheme, Caligo memnon, Caligo eurilochus, Asterocampa leilia, Morpho peleides
Group default[2][3][7]
Eye type
compound eye
Field of viewNo value in the catalogue.
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
median of 91 relatives in class Insecta: Empis prodromus, Rhamphomyia albidiventris, Rhamphomyia breviventris, Rhamphomyia maculipennis, Rhamphomyia marginata, Rhamphomyia murina
Group default[8]
Fovea type
none
Group default[8]
Night visionActivity pattern
nocturnal
mode of 1 relatives in genus Saturnia: Saturnia pyri
Estimated[9]
Rods vs cones
no rods (invertebrate photoreceptors)
Estimated[9]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
75.8 Hz
median of 2 rows (no bright-light flag) (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [75.0, 76.7])
Measured[10][11]

Related animals

More insects: all insects with measured vision data.

Sources

  1. van der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K, Belusic G, Kelber A. 2021. Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435-461. Supplementary table. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
  2. Martín-Gabarrella, Gemeno, Škorjanc et al. 2025. Pupil dynamics reveal the tuning of tortricid moths to diel activity. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology. doi.org/10.1007/s00359-025-01759-0
  3. Caves EM, Brandley NC, Johnsen S (2018) Visual acuity and the evolution of signals. Trends Ecol Evol 33:358-372. Supplementary Tables S1-S3.. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
  4. AndrewPMeade/FabricTools, sciphy/data_utils/datasets/Arthropod.CompoundEyes.csv (acuity, body length, light, media for 281 arthropods; columns match Feller et al. 2021 Arthropod Struct Dev 60:101002). github.com/AndrewPMeade/FabricTools
  5. Feller KD, Sharkey CR, McDuffee-Altekruse A, Bracken-Grissom HD, Lord NP, Porter ML, Schweikert LE 2021. Surf and turf vision: patterns and predictors of visual acuity in compound eye evolution. Arthropod Structure & Development 60:101002. doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2020.101002
  6. Wright DS, Manel AN, Guachamin-Rosero M, Chamba-Vaca P, Bacquet CN, Merrill RM 2023. Quantifying visual acuity in Heliconius butterflies. Biology Letters. zenodo.org/records/10127023
  7. Currea JP, Sondhi Y, Kawahara AY, Theobald J. 2023. Measuring compound eye optics with microscope and microCT images. Commun Biol 6:246
  8. Comparative data for dance fly eye morphology and female ornamentation (Empididae). Data: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z. doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxd5z
  9. Sondhi Y, Ellis EA, Bybee SM, Theobald JC, Kawahara AY. 2021. Light environment drives evolution of color vision genes in butterflies and moths. Commun Biol 4:177
  10. Inger R, Bennie J, Davies TW, Gaston KJ. 2014. Potential biological and ecological effects of flickering artificial light. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98631. Table 3. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098631
  11. Lafitte A, Sordello R, Legrand M, Nicolas V, Obein G, Reyjol Y. 2022. A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279718. S10 File (CFF database). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
  12. Healy K, McNally L, Ruxton GD, Cooper N, Jackson AL. 2013. Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour 86:685-696. Table 1. doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.018

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this?