California sea lion vision: the science and the numbers
Zalophus californianus · order Carnivora · Mammals: all the numbers
The California sea lion has one cone type, so no colour vision in daylight.[1] Its sharpest vision resolves 5.625 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6][7]
- 1colour receptor classMeasured*
- 5.625cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
The California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is a mammal in the order Carnivora. Its eyes belong to the vision type Marine mammal cone monochromat: a single cone type, so no hue at all, in a rod-dominated eye. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What the California sea lion sees: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has one receptor class for colour, so it sees brightness but no hue.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 5.625 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- Activity pattern: cathemeral.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 1 receptor class: 501.3 nm (MWS (green)) measured in this species | Measured (not re-verified) | [1] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[2][3][4][5] |
| Sharpness | Acuity 5.625 cycles per degree median of 2 behavioural rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6][7] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 88.5° median of 4 relatives in order Carnivora: Canis lupus, Felis catus, Mustela putorius, Mustela nivalis | Group default | [9][10] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[9][10] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[11] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[11] Eye placement: frontal Derived[9][10] |
| Total field of view 250° median species-v1 total field of order Carnivora: Canis familiaris | Group default | [12] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 0 median of 10 relatives in order Carnivora: Canis lupus, Vulpes lagopus, Acinonyx jubatus, Felis catus, Crocuta crocuta, Enhydra lutris | Group default | [13] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[13] Fovea type: fovea Measured[13] |
| Fovea type area centralis, horizontal streak | Group default | [13] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern cathemeral mode of 4 rows (of 6 rows): aquatic; cathemeral; diurnal; mixed (nocturnal/crepuscular, cathemeral, crepuscular or diurnal/crepuscular); nocturnal/crepuscular | Measured (not re-verified) | [14][15][16][17][18] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[19][14][15][2][16][17][20][18] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[21][22] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[23] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[19][14][15][2][16][17][20][18] |
| Rods vs cones mixed nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [14][15][16][17][18] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 76.25 Hz median of 4 relatives in order Carnivora: Felis catus, Canis lupus, Pagophilus groenlandicus, Canis familiaris | Group default | [24][25][26][27] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[25][26] |
All mammals side by side: Mammals: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Murphy et al. 2022
- Longcore 2023
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- de Sousa et al. 2022
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Miller & Murphy 1995
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Moura et al. 2024
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Haarlem et al. 2026
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
- Lafitte et al. 2022
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.