See Like Animals Open the tool

Gray mouse lemur vision: the science and the numbers

Microcebus murinus · order Primates · Mammals: all the numbers

The gray mouse lemur has 2 colour receptor classes (409 and 558 nm): mainly blues and yellows; reds and greens look alike.[1][2] Its sharpest vision resolves 4.55 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6][7]

  • 2colour receptor classesMeasured
  • 4.55cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured

The gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) is a mammal in the order Primates. Its eyes belong to the vision type Day dichromat mammal: two cone types (blue and yellow, so reds and greens merge), moderate sharpness and a horizontal band of sharp vision. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.

This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.

What the gray mouse lemur sees: colour receptors

Gray mouse lemur colour receptor peaks, 300 to 700 nmGray mouse lemur: 2 receptor peaks at 409, 558 nm; you: 3 at 421.5, 532, 558.4 nm. ultraviolet300400500600700
Gray mouse lemur: 409, 558 nmPeople: 421.5, 532, 558.4 nmWavelength in nanometres

What stands out

  • It has two colour receptor classes (a dichromat): reds and greens fall on one axis, as in red-green colour blindness in people.
  • Its sharpest vision resolves 4.55 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
  • Activity pattern: nocturnal.

The six dials

Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.

Vision values for the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus), catalogue-v1
DialValueEvidenceSourcesPeople
ColourColour receptors
2 receptor classes: 409 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 558 nm (LWS (long))
measured in this species
Measured[1][2]Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[1][3][4][5]
SharpnessAcuity
4.55 cycles per degree
median of 2 anatomical-ganglion rows (method priority rule)
Measured[6][7]Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[8][7]
Field of viewBinocular overlap
137°
median of 6 relatives in order Primates: Otolemur crassicaudatus, Cephalopachus bancanus, Aotus trivirgatus, Saimiri sciureus, Macaca mulatta, Homo sapiens
Group default[9][10]Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[9][10]
Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[11]
Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[11]
Eye placement: frontal Derived[9][10]
Total field of view
200°
median species-v1 total field of order Primates: Homo sapiens
Group default[11]
Sharp zones (foveas)Number of foveas
0
fovea_present / area_centralis_type (retinal topography; count 1 = fovea present, 0 = none)
Measured[12]Number of foveas: 1 Measured[12]
Fovea type: fovea Measured[12]
Fovea type
area centralis
Measured[12]
Night visionActivity pattern
nocturnal
mode of 9 rows (of 9 rows): nocturnal; scotopic
Measured (not re-verified)[13][14][15][1][16][17][18][19]Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[13][14][15][1][16][17][18][19]
Pupil shape: vertical Group default[20][21]
Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[22]
Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[13][14][15][1][16][17][18][19]
Rods vs cones
rod-dominated
nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated
Derived[13][14][15][1][16][17][18][19]
Motion (flicker fusion)Flicker fusion frequency
69 Hz
median of 3 relatives in order Primates: Macaca mulatta, Macaca nemestrina, Homo sapiens
Group default[23][24][25]Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[23][24]

All mammals side by side: Mammals: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.

Sources

  1. Longcore 2023
  2. VPOD in-vivo (MSP / single-cell) lambda… 2025
  3. Kirwan
  4. Müller et al. 2009
  5. Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
  6. Kirk et al. 2004
  7. Veilleux et al. 2014
  8. Kirk et al. 2004
  9. Heesy 2004
  10. Heffner et al. 1992
  11. Campbell & Green 1965
  12. Kopania et al. 2025
  13. Anderson et al. 2017
  14. Borges et al. 2018
  15. Wilman et al. 2014
  16. Maor et al. 2017
  17. Jones et al. 2009
  18. Schmitz et al. 2011
  19. Moura et al. 2024
  20. Banks et al. 2015
  21. Cervino et al. 2021
  22. Guareschi et al. 2025
  23. Healy et al. 2013
  24. Inger et al. 2014
  25. Lafitte et al. 2022

Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.