Chicken vision: the science and the numbers
Gallus gallus · order Galliformes · Birds: all the numbers
Chickens have four colour channels, including violet (418, 455, 507 and 569 nm).[1][2] Their sharpest vision resolves 7 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6][7] Chickens stop seeing flicker at 104 Hz, against 60 Hz for people.[42]
- 4colour receptor classesMeasured
- 7cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
- 104hertz flicker fusion (motion)Measured
The chicken (Gallus gallus) is a bird in the order Galliformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Panoramic grain-eater and wader: four cone types, low to moderate sharpness and an almost all-round field of view. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, foveas, night vision and motion (flicker fusion). Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What chickens see: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has 4 colour receptor classes; people have 3.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 7 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- It stops seeing flicker at 104 Hz, against 60 Hz for people in this dataset, so fast motion looks about 1.7 times slower to it.[43][44]
- Activity pattern: diurnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 4 receptor classes: 418 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 455 nm (SWS (blue)), 507 nm (MWS (green)), 569 nm (LWS (long)) measured in this species | Measured | [1][2] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[2][3][4][5] |
| Sharpness | Acuity 7 cycles per degree median of 5 behavioural rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6][7] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[8][9] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 27.5° median of 133 relatives in class Aves: Accipiter cooperii, Spatula clypeata, Mareca penelope, Anas platyrhynchos, Ardeola ralloides, Baeolophus bicolor | Group default | [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[19][20] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[21] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[21] Eye placement: frontal Derived[19][20] |
| Total field of view 338° group default: median total field of vision type the "Panoramic grain-eater and wader" type within phylum Chordata in species-v1: Columba livia, Scolopax minor | Group default | [22][23] | ||
| Blind area behind the head 22° | Group default | [22][23] | ||
| Eye placement lateral | Group default | [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 1 species-v1.csv text: area centralis (no true fovea) | Measured (not re-verified) | [24] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[25] Fovea type: fovea Measured[25] |
| Fovea type area centralis | Measured | [26][24] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal mode of 8 rows (of 8 rows): diurnal; not_nocturnal | Measured (not re-verified) | [27][28][29][30][31][2][32][33] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[27][34][35][2][36][37][38][33] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[39][40] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[41] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[27][34][35][2][36][37][38][33] |
| Rods vs cones cone-dominated nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [27][28][29][30][31][2][32][33] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 104 Hz median of 1 bright-light rows (behavioural/whole-eye ERG rows; all rows: [104.0]) | Measured | [42] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[43][44] |
All birds side by side: Birds: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Lind et al. 2014
- Longcore 2023
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Caves et al. 2018
- Caves et al. 2024
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Cantlay et al. 2023
- Lucas et al. 2024
- Vision et al. 2026
- Pecsics et al. 2023
- Portugal et al. 2023
- Potier et al. 2018
- Potier et al. 2023
- Tyrrell et al. 2017
- Tyrrell et al. 2017
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Martin & Young 1983
- Martin 1994
- Morris 1982
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Schaeffel et al. 2025
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Angielczyk et al. 2014
- Light conditions and the evolution of…
- Choiniere et al. 2021
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Moura et al. 2024
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Lafitte et al. 2022
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.