Mourning dove vision: the science and the numbers
Zenaida macroura · order Columbiformes · Birds: all the numbers
Their sharpest vision resolves 6.89 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6] Both eyes see the same 9° in front of them.[9]
- 6.89cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
- 9°seen by both eyesMeasured
The mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) is a bird in the order Columbiformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type Panoramic grain-eater and wader: four cone types, low to moderate sharpness and an almost all-round field of view. Measured in this species: sharpness, field of view, foveas and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What mourning doves see: colour receptors
What stands out
- Its sharpest vision resolves 6.89 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- Both eyes see the same 9° in front of it (binocular overlap), where depth is judged best.
- Activity pattern: diurnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 4 receptor classes: 406.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 453 nm (SWS (blue)), 507 nm (MWS (green)), 567 nm (LWS (long)) receptor set of nearest measured relative Columba livia (same family Columbidae) | Estimated | [1][2] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[2][3][4][5] |
| Sharpness | Acuity 6.89 cycles per degree median of 1 anatomical-ganglion rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 9° median of 1 rows (eyes-at-rest rows preferred) | Measured | [9] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[10][11] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[12] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[12] Eye placement: frontal Derived[10][11] |
| Total field of view 316° median species-v1 total field of family Columbidae: Columba livia | Estimated | [13] | ||
| Blind area behind the head 44° | Estimated | [13] | ||
| Eye placement lateral frontal if binocular overlap >= 60 deg, else lateral | Derived | [9] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 1 retinal topography | Measured (not re-verified) | [14] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[15] Fovea type: fovea Measured[15] |
| Fovea type single central fovea (displaced dorso-temporally from retinal centre) | Measured (not re-verified) | [14] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal mode of 3 rows (of 3 rows): diurnal; not_nocturnal; photopic | Measured (not re-verified) | [16][17][18] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[19][20][21][2][22][23][17][18] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[24][25] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[26] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[19][20][21][2][22][23][17][18] |
| Rods vs cones cone-dominated nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [16][17][18] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 88.5 Hz median of 1 relatives in family Columbidae: Columba livia | Estimated | [27][28] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[27][29] |
Other senses
- magnetoreception: NOT RENDERED (no agreed visual percept) (Group default)
All birds side by side: Birds: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Lind et al. 2014
- Longcore 2023
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Caves et al. 2018
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Tyrrell et al. 2017
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Martin & Young 1983
- Moore et al. 2017
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Moura et al. 2024
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Healy et al. 2013
- Lafitte et al. 2022
- Inger et al. 2014
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.