Rook vision: the science and the numbers
Corvus frugilegus · order Passeriformes · Birds: all the numbers
Rooks have four colour channels, including ultraviolet (372.5, 443, 497 and 565 nm).[1][2] Their sharpest vision resolves 30 cycles per degree, against 63.75 for people in this dataset.[6] Both eyes see the same 13° in front of them.[9]
- 4colour receptor classesMeasured
- 30cycles per degree (sharpness)Measured
- 13°seen by both eyesMeasured
The rook (Corvus frugilegus) is a bird in the order Passeriformes. Its eyes belong to the vision type UV songbird, parrot and hummingbird: four cone types including a true ultraviolet cone, coloured oil droplets and fast motion vision. Measured in this species: colour, sharpness, field of view and night vision. Measured core: measured values on at least 3 of the 6 dials.
This is a simulation built from published eye measurements, not what the animal experiences.
What rooks see: colour receptors
What stands out
- It has 4 colour receptor classes, including ultraviolet; people have 3.
- Its sharpest vision resolves 30 cycles per degree: the finest stripe pattern it can tell apart from grey.
- Both eyes see the same 13° in front of it (binocular overlap), where depth is judged best.
- Activity pattern: diurnal.
The six dials
Evidence levels: how the tiers work. "Measured" means a value measured in this species; "Estimated" values come from a close relative or an eye-size formula. The last column gives the values for people from the same catalogue.
| Dial | Value | Evidence | Sources | People |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | Colour receptors 4 receptor classes: 372.5 nm (UVS), 443 nm (SWS (blue)), 497 nm (MWS (green)), 565 nm (LWS (long)) measured in this species | Measured | [1][2] | Colour receptors: 3 receptor classes: 421.5 nm (VS/SWS (violet)), 532 nm (MWS (green)), 558.4 nm (LWS (long)) Measured (not re-verified)[2][3][4][5] |
| Ultraviolet yes: at least one receptor peaks in the ultraviolet | Measured | |||
| Sharpness | Acuity 30 cycles per degree median of 1 behavioural rows (method priority rule) | Measured | [6] | Acuity: 63.75 cycles per degree Measured[7][8] |
| Field of view | Binocular overlap 13° median of 1 rows (eyes-at-rest rows preferred) | Measured | [9] | Binocular overlap: 122.5° Measured[10][11] Total field of view: 200° Measured (not re-verified)[12] Blind area behind the head: 160° Derived[12] Eye placement: frontal Derived[10][11] |
| Total field of view 335° median total field (measured, or 360 - blind area) of relatives in genus Corvus: Corvus brachyrhynchos | Estimated | [13] | ||
| Blind area behind the head 25° | Estimated | [13] | ||
| Eye placement lateral frontal if binocular overlap >= 60 deg, else lateral | Derived | [9] | ||
| Sharp zones (foveas) | Number of foveas 1 median of 1 relatives in family Corvidae: Cyanocitta cristata | Estimated | [14] | Number of foveas: 1 Measured[15] Fovea type: fovea Measured[15] |
| Fovea type single central fovea (displaced dorso-temporally from retinal centre) | Estimated | [14] | ||
| Night vision | Activity pattern diurnal mode of 4 rows (of 4 rows): diurnal; not_nocturnal | Measured (not re-verified) | [16][17][2][18] | Activity pattern: diurnal Measured (not re-verified)[19][20][21][2][22][23][24][18] Pupil shape: vertical Group default[25][26] Reflective layer (tapetum): no Measured[27] Rods vs cones: cone-dominated Derived[19][20][21][2][22][23][24][18] |
| Rods vs cones cone-dominated nocturnal -> rod-dominated; crepuscular / cathemeral / mixed -> mixed; diurnal -> cone-dominated | Derived | [16][17][2][18] | ||
| Motion (flicker fusion) | Flicker fusion frequency 100 Hz median of 7 relatives in order Passeriformes: Passer domesticus, Taeniopygia guttata, Molothrus ater, Sturnus vulgaris, Cyanistes caeruleus, Ficedula albicollis | Group default | [28][29][30][31] | Flicker fusion frequency: 60 Hz Measured[29][30] |
Other senses
- magnetoreception: NOT RENDERED (no agreed visual percept) (Group default)
All birds side by side: Birds: every measurement. Method: how we know what animals see.
Sources
- Lind et al. 2014
- Longcore 2023
- Kirwan
- Müller et al. 2009
- Thermal Activation and Photoactivation of Visual… 2004
- Caves et al. 2018
- Kirk et al. 2004
- Veilleux et al. 2014
- Tyrrell et al. 2017
- Heesy 2004
- Heffner et al. 1992
- Campbell & Green 1965
- Tyrrell et al. 2017
- Moore et al. 2017
- Kopania et al. 2025
- Light conditions and the evolution of…
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Moura et al. 2024
- Anderson et al. 2017
- Borges et al. 2018
- Wilman et al. 2014
- Maor et al. 2017
- Jones et al. 2009
- Schmitz et al. 2011
- Banks et al. 2015
- Cervino et al. 2021
- Guareschi et al. 2025
- Boström et al. 2016
- Healy et al. 2013
- Inger et al. 2014
- Lafitte et al. 2022
Every value cites its sources (all sources). Values were extracted from these works and converted (units, medians, derived values); changes are ours, and the listed sources do not endorse this site. Data: catalogue-v1, built 2026-09-29. Accuracy notes: how accurate is this? Method: how we know.